I liked Ika's answer to Chris's post but she was led to think that she wasn't ever incharge, and she didn't realize it herself.
I casted my vote (a little early but I finished reading & I dont think I"m going to change it)
We complain about this final 2 and we say how it's the worst final 2 ever and this and that, but at the end of the day it is the final two. Who are we to say Ika played a goats game when clearly it worked. Who are we to say that Dan played an inactive's game when clearly it was enough to get him to the end compared to the other half a dozen inactives in this game; multiple of whom didn't quit. Dan could've easily been a Monet or a Hayden.
We're comparing this final 2 to ourselves when we SHOULD be comparing this final 2 to each other, and I personally think that's the better way to go about it. I think we would be more satisfied with whoever won that way and I think that... while this final 2 is very underwhelming, it's still our final 2. I think it's actually funny that Rachelle and Shilpa ate this competition up, then Rachelle ate Shilpa up, and then Rachelle fell to Ika at the final 3. Believe me, I would REALLY prefer a Rachelle win, but I still think that it's a very derpy funny final 2 for such an intense season. Funny how this season had two major competitors in the HoH's; Shilpa and Rachelle, and the two major "losers" manage to beat both of them. I dunno, maybe I'm trying too hard to see the positives in things, but I'm not one to complain about a finale.